Douglas Wilson has graciously offered to debate me publicly in an oral format. I thank him most kindly for the compliment that such an offer implies. I will be quite honest and frank: I don’t have the same rhetorical skills that Wilson has. I have been assiduously avoiding any kind of scathing remarks directed towards Wilson, because I really don’t want his atomic rhetoric directed my way (and, by the way, the reference to “atomic rhetoric” is not meant as a slam either; it is only an illustration of the power of rhetoric, especially Wilson’s). I’ve thrown a few “jabs” his way, and he to me. However, even he has admitted that these are “above the belt.” So far, it is an honest contest. I get caught up in the heat of a moment such as a debate would entail. It is not usually good for my sanctification. Here on the blogs, I have the luxury (and necessary help!) of my library. I admit it freely: I use my library as a crutch. So, in respectfully declining Wilson’s invitation, I am only acknowledging my own sinfulness and inadequacy that such a debate would inevitably augment.
I am grateful for the dialog/debate that Wilson and I have engaged in over the period of these last several months on our blogs, and I hope we can keep that going, even past my review of RINE. It seems to be fruitful (judging by comments from FV advocates and critics alike). Plus, I can control my own temperature much better. It does seem to be the only place left on the internet where FV advocate and critic can still interact, and I do not want to jeopardize that, which I feel an oral debate would do.
Speaking of jeopardizing debate, since lesser means have been inadequate to quell the caustic remarks of some, these four writers will be temporarily suspended from posting privileges, until they can show that their tone can be respectful of my wishes on this blog: RobertK, MarkT, Sean Gerety, and Stewart Quarles. They can try to comment, but their comments will be deleted. I am sorry to use this method, fellas. But you have to stay on topic, which is the original post. Currently, there will be a one week waiting period, after which they will be allowed back on condition of non-troll-like comments. If that can be shown, then they will be welcome back. I trust that these four writers will respect my wishes. Don’t make me erase all the comments you have ever posted on this blog, so that any new comments are caught in the moderator’s queue. I will do that, if you do not respect these commands. That will mean that you will never even have the opportunity to post again on this blog. This is my blog, and I have control over it. I have been lax up until now in the hopes that cool heads and clear thinking will prevail. That has not happened. If you want to rant, get your own blog/do it on your own blog.
Let me be clear. 1. This is not an utter, final suspension. 2. The tone of comments on my blog needs definite improvement, as many commenters have now noted. 3. The relative positions of these four writers are now well-known to all, and they are not typically adding new things to the discussion. 4. Their comments are having a tendency to discourage other commenters from writing. 5. The standard for comments is that it must be on topic, which is defined as being closely or directly related to the post itself. 6. The tone will be respectful of all other commenters, false teachers or not. This is not a church court. No name-calling will be allowed.
Let me say how disappointed I am in the turn this blog has taken in the comments. I do not like making rules up like this. I want this blog to be a scholarly interaction with ideas, not a slam attack on people. I am all for heat in a blog debate, as I have shown myself on many occasions. But it should be heat directed at a position, not at a person. We must distinguish (however slightly) between the person and the position. People can hold positions out of many reasons, not all of them bad motives. Good motives do not excuse bad theology. However, good motives can mean that someone with bad theology is not trying to be a snake. However improbable that might seem to some, that leeway is given by me to Wilson at the very least.