An Interview I Did While On Vacation

Dr. R. Scott Clark was gracious to invite me to do a podcast while I was on vacation. The podcast has to do with the Federal Vision.

10 Comments

  1. Scott said,

    March 12, 2010 at 5:44 pm

    Very informative interview, both interviewer and interviewee.

    The podcast seems to cut off at the end, is there a part 2?

  2. TE Stephen Welch said,

    March 13, 2010 at 11:38 am

    I clicked on the podcast several times and I get no response. Is there some kind of magic formula or another way to access it?

  3. greenbaggins said,

    March 13, 2010 at 11:41 am

    I clicked on it, and got it to play. It comes on after several seconds. So you may have to wait a bit to get it to play.

  4. TE Stephen Welch said,

    March 13, 2010 at 12:22 pm

    I was able to go to RS Clarks blog and access it. Yes, there is a delay but only a few seconds. Thanks Lane for a good discussion. I look forward to part two.

  5. March 13, 2010 at 10:23 pm

    Lane,

    I just had a chance to listen to it. Excellent summary of the issues. Thanks to you and Dr. Clark for taking the time.

  6. March 14, 2010 at 3:35 pm

    First rate stuff. Thanks!!!!!!! That audio clip from Jordan where he says that God has made all Calvinists except the FVer stupid was classic.

  7. March 21, 2010 at 5:52 pm

    Pastor Keister,

    I just got a chance to listen to this episode and I thought that you did an excellent job of summarizing the FV and its errors. But I was a little surprised that you mentioned one of the minor issues that FV affects is how you view the millennium and you specifically mentions postmillennialism. I am a confessional Presbyterian and reject the FV as being out of accord with Reformed confessions and the Bible. But I am also postmillennial and I don’t see how the FV and postmill are related. There are plenty of postmills who view the FV as heresy. While several advocates of FV are postmill, I don’t see how the FV affects your millennial view. I would also consider postmill to be an orthodox Reformed position, and am curious as to why it was mentioned as an issue within the FV. If you could clarify what exactly you meant here, I would appreciate it.

    Thank you for your stalwart stance for the “faith which was once for all delivered to the saints.”

    In Christ,
    Dustin

  8. greenbaggins said,

    March 22, 2010 at 3:48 pm

    Dustin, I do not view postmillenialism as being out of accord with the confessional standards. I believe my observation was limited to saying that almost all the FV supporters are postmil. When one reads the joint FV statement, they made it a non-negotiable of the FV theology.

  9. March 25, 2010 at 4:34 pm

    Pastor, thanks for clarifying. I didn’t realize they had made it officially part of the FV. Can you direct me to the joint statement you referred to?

  10. March 25, 2010 at 4:39 pm

    I found the joint statement here:

    http://www.federal-vision.com/?p=10


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: