Acts Commentary Now Available

This commentary is now available.



  1. George said,

    April 28, 2009 at 4:40 pm

    Could you please put the title and authors for books in the post? Is the Westminster referral worth irritating your readers? I appreciate this blog, but this is just too much. Thanks.

  2. greenbaggins said,

    April 28, 2009 at 5:05 pm

    George, I understand your frustration. However, the point is to get people actually to go to the Westminster bookstore website. I’ve discovered that unless I do it this way, no one goes there. When I give all the information, I get about 1/20 of the click-throughs I get when I entice them this way. The bookstore wants people on their website, because increased traffic always means increased sales. I have to pique curiosity in order for the advertising to work. That’s the way the ball works. If all my hundreds of readers would promise to click through anyway, even if I gave all the info, that would be one thing. Somehow, I have a hunch that it ain’t happening.

  3. David Gadbois said,

    April 28, 2009 at 5:57 pm

    I’ve not heard of David Peterson. Where is he coming from on the theological spectrum? I already have Bock on Acts, and am looking for another good conservative one to go with it.

  4. GLW Johnson said,

    April 29, 2009 at 6:35 am

    Peterson is an Anglican and teaches at Moore College in Sydney. He did his PhD at Manchester under F.F. Bruce, who likewise took a special interest in the book of Acts.

  5. Reformed Sinner said,

    May 18, 2009 at 12:23 pm

    this book (just got it for a week as I am teaching Acts to my Youth Group) is a welcome addition. The other ones I’ve got are…. “weird” to say the least, and the one by Dennis Johnson, “Let’s Study Acts”, is so superficial (I meant it in the best way possible) that it hardly helps to do a study on the book Acts (maybe that’s it, not meant for serious study)

  6. August 3, 2009 at 8:23 am

    I’m curious if anyone has any observations about how Witherington, Bock, and Peterson stand up against each other. I’m planning to begin reading a commentary on Acts in a few months, and I’m not sure which of these three to read. I only want to read one. I’ll be able to refer to others, but I want one primary commentary to focus on. My sense from reading reviews is that Bock repeats a lot of Witherington but with less detail, and he tends to cite commentators more than providing his own arguments. Peterson seems to have based his comments on Witherington and Bock, so that gives his commentary one advantage over the others, but in my experience this only helps if he puts them to good use and is properly critical of them. It’s hard to know this without looking at it, so I’d appreciate hearing from anyone has has done so.

  7. greenbaggins said,

    August 3, 2009 at 10:07 am

    Jeremy, my impression from glancing at the commentary is that Peterson has been working on Acts for decades, and that this commentary is the culmination of that research. Peterson is certainly not enslaved to Bock (he quotes Barrett and Bruce FAR more than Bock). He quotes Barrett more than Witherington, too. I don’t think he’s anyone’s parrot. My impression is of strong, careful research. If Carson can say ‘sane, even-handed, and judicious,” that’s good enough for me. I would probably recommend Peterson over Bock and Witherington.

  8. August 3, 2009 at 10:45 am

    I didn’t mean to suggest that he was parroting anyone, just that he came latest and had access to their work, so he could base his comments on more information than they had. I was surprised to see him citing Bock at all, since he must have had Bock’s commentary in manuscript to have had time to take it into account when writing. His manuscript was almost certainly almost done with its final draft when Bock was published.

    I’m curious what you think of the relative strengths and weaknesses of Witherington and Bock. Do you have any observations on those two?

    O’Brien and Hoehner managed to do this with their Ephesians commentaries, but unfortunately only Hoehner could give paginations, since O’Brien didn’t have Hoehner’s final draft. It doesn’t look like Bock had Peterson, though, so that gives Peterson’s a big advantage.

  9. greenbaggins said,

    August 3, 2009 at 11:20 am

    Yes, it’s always fun to talk about commentaries with you, Jeremy, because we pay attention to the same sorts of things. I also marveled (and rejoiced!) that Peterson could quote Bock. I agree that he must have had at least a ms in front of him.

    Witherington is at his best in Acts, in my opinion. His Arminianism gets him into least trouble there, and his socio-rhetorical approach works well with Acts (doesn’t work so well with Romans or the Gospels, in my opinion). It’s a very helpful guide.

    Bock comes at it from the Lukan perspective, having written probably the definitive commentary on Luke for the foreseeable future. So, Bock’s strength’s is in tying the theology of Acts back to Luke, something he does far better than Witherington. I, for one, would not want to be without any of these three commentaries. I would hate to have to choose among the three as you are going to have to do. I would still choose Peterson, but I would always be wanting at least to reference the other two while I was going through.

  10. August 3, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    I do plan to have all three present. I just want to read one cover-to-cover and just refer to the others when it seems appropriate. It’s easier to see when that’s appropriate if the one I’m reading actually cites the other two from time to time, which is another reason to favor Peterson.

    If I were teaching this to others, I’d probably not limit myself to reading just one, but I’m just doing this as a part of my initial sweep through the Bible trying to make sure I’ve done each book of the Bible in a Bible study, sermons, or commentary reading. I’ve only got 7 NT and 10 OT books still to be completed, some of which have been partially done.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: