Reformation fundamentals

Around the Reformed blogosphere, Reformation Day is being celebrated. I will add my two-cents worth here by trying to describe in brief fashion the distinctives of the Reformation.

The first distinctive of the Reformation is is emphasis on the glory of God. This is one of the five solas. However, in many ways, this is the architectonic one. Everything resolves ultimately to the glory of God alone.

Of course, the rest of the solas are vital. We are saved by grace alone, through faith alone, by Christ alone, revealed to us in Scripture alone. Justification by faith alone is the material principle of the Reformation, while Scripture alone was the foundational principle. The former doctrine was rediscovered, not discovered, and was directed against the Roman Catholic Church’s teaching, which was primarily semi-Pelagian. The principle of Scripture alone was directed against the Roman Catholic elevation of the Pope and tradition to the level of Scripture. Nothing has the same authority in our lives that Scripture has. This does not mean that we ignore what the church has said. But we must always subordinate what people say to what God says.

The Five Points of Calvinism is not definitive for the entire Reformation, but it is definitive of the Reformed branch of the Reformation. These were the decisions reached by the Canons of Dort in response to Arminian teaching about an absolute free will.

Another distinctive of the Reformation is a rediscovery of the Covenant. Covenant theology is the best way of describing God’s relationship to His people. The Covenant is not the relationship itself. Rather, it is the documentation of the relationship. It is what is down on paper.


  1. theologian said,

    October 31, 2006 at 1:19 pm

    Soli Deo Gloria!

    That is a great summary – 5 solas, TULIP, and Covenant Theology.

    I was also thinking that these would make a good addition: universal priesthood of believers, holding to only two sacraments, and the perspicuity of Scripture (unless that would be under Sola Scriptura).

  2. Gomarus said,

    October 31, 2006 at 2:10 pm

    architectonic? Boy, there is my new word for the day! Thanks.

    Post Tenebras Lux — today’s post at my place. I have really enjoyed this year’s commemoration of Reformation Day around the weblogs. Tomorrow, drop by for my introduction to the Synod of Dort. :-)

  3. Josh said,

    October 31, 2006 at 2:30 pm

    Well said, I am thinking of something that starts with “fan” and ends in “tastic!”

  4. theologian said,

    October 31, 2006 at 3:08 pm


    Would the word you are looking for be “fantectonictastic” ;)

  5. greenbaggins said,

    November 1, 2006 at 10:16 am

    Yes, Larry, I agree with your assessment. Certainly the perspecuity of Scripture comes under sola Scriptura. The priesthood of believers is certainly a separate issue from what I have said, although it is an implication of solus Christus (we don’t need priests: Christ has made us priests). The Sacraments are not connected to other issues, as far as I know, although it could arguably be related to sola Scriptura. Maybe, I’ll have to think about that one.

  6. Susan said,

    November 1, 2006 at 4:30 pm

    Words like “perspicuity” are amusing to me. I take it the irony is evident :).

  7. greenbaggins said,

    November 1, 2006 at 4:58 pm

    Indeed. :-) The only problem with such irony is that most Reformed folk take themselves too seriously to appreciate it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: